Home » Books, Culture
29 November 2010, 1:06 pm 2 Comments

Books: Stephen King and The Case of the Psychotic Lesbian

This post was submitted by Zack Rosen

Oh, overused tropes of fiction: Psychotic homosexuals be thy name. High art and low have dipped into the well so often that it’s a miracle Baby Jessica isn’t hanging out in there with Bart Simpson’s tape recorder. Battlestar Galactica, one of the modern age’s best queer allegories, featured two subplots involving the show’s only gay characters proving themselves to be evil, masochistic or murderous. Those characters, though, were fully-formed and perhaps just extensions of BSG’s larger points about identity and hardship. Ramona Norville, villain of Stephen King’s new novella “Big Driver” accepts no such justifications.

“Big Driver,” second in King’s new four-novella collection Full Dark, No Stars is (sucky spoiler alert) the woman who invites mystery author Tess to a speaking engagement in her small town. She is also responsible for giving Tess “shortcut” directions that allow Tess to be raped by Ramona’s equally psychotic sons. Her two salient characteristics are that she is butch and bonkers.Ramona is introduced in the following manner:

“Ramona Norville turned out to be a broad-shouldered, heavy-breasted, jovial woman… with flushed cheeks, a marine haircut and a take-no-prisoners handshake… Instead of wishing Tess a good morning… she asked a man’s question: Had Tess come by [route] 84?

King supplements this four pages later, in case we didn’t get it, that Ramona watches Tess input directions into her GPS with “manly interest” because, of course, only men take a vested interest in a car’s ability to deliver a driver to their destination. That’s why my mom and sisters close their eyes, stomp the pedal and just hope for the best whenever they drive places. Except they don’t because they aren’t in a Stephen King story. But I digress.

To remove any doubt about Ms. Norville’s orientation, King includes a picture of her and her girlfriend in Norville’s living room. And a whole lot of references to her size and quarterback-like strength when Tess eventually stabs her for her involvement in the rape. This is a good time to mention that “Big Driver” is not very good. I’ve read a lot of good Stephen King books (because I used to be a relatively-friendless 11 year-old) and this isn’t one of them. It, The Shining, The Long Walk, Apt Pupil: Those are good. None of the novella’s in Full Dark, No Stars count among King’s best, or are even that much different than one hundred things he’s done before.

Which answers my next question: Why make Ramona a lesbian? King mines horror out of every-day objects and situations (A hotel, a clown, a prom) and it seems that he’s running out of quotidian ephemera to make us shiver. Ergo, introduce a lesbian! Ramona Norville isn’t just any kind of lesbian. She’s butcher than Maggie Walsh on Season 4 of Buffy, and implies a physical, masculine threat in her mere presence. King has to make Norville a character who is capable of raising two rapist monsters for sons and it seems that making her extremely gender-non-comformist is the way to do it.

When it comes to gay characters in popular works, its always fun to ask yourself “Why are they gay, and what would the story lose if they were straight?” I honestly can’t think of anything substantial to answer those questions with in this case. The only thing lost would be the centuries of menace that come from the outdated notion of queer folks being crazy. Alternately, what is lost is the idea that Stephen King is still doing something original and doesn’t need sensationalistic lesbian undertones to prove his points.


First time here? See what we're all about... Get involved... Send us a tip!...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

2 Comments »

  • kelli anne Busey said:

    ‘Gay Crazy’ or ‘Tranny’ both phrases and are damaging.

  • Aaron said:

    Everything he’s done since about ‘The Dark Half’ has been on a downward slope, but this really takes the cake. Makes me glad I stick with the older stuff he wrote back when he really had something to say, instead of paying good money for lousy work.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.