Home » Politics
1 March 2010, 12:00 pm 3 Comments

Politics: Mormons and Gays: A Symbiotic Relationship?

This post was submitted by Kelly Catherine Chapman.

I am a former member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (a.k.a. The Mormon Church) and resident of Utah – and a member of the LGBT community currently living in Washington, D.C. This trifecta of identities gives me some acute insight into Representative Chaffetz’s and Senator Bennett’s recent proposed legislation regarding the DC Council’s vote to legalize same-sex marriage.

As a Mormon, I knew the frustration that all Mormons share with regards to politics: no one takes Mormons seriously! Mormons grieve over the fact that arguably qualified, intelligent candidates like Mitt Romney, and potential future candidates such as Governor-turned-Ambassador Jon Huntsman, are hastily dismissed as presidential material by many, simply because of their religious beliefs.

Having lived in Washington, D.C. for nearly three years, I also know the frustration of Washingtonians who yearn for more representation in Congress and bemoan the fact that unlike any state, where when the Governor signs a bill it becomes law (except California…?), we have to wait every time to see if 500+ people have any issues with it, or would like to use an attempt to block it as a political tool.

And finally, as a member of the LGBT community, I know the frustration of not being taken seriously in, well, a hell of a lot of ways – except maybe taken as a serious problem.

With these views in mind, I have some advice for Representative Chaffetz and Senator Bennett, and their LDS colleagues and successors: If LDS politicians want to be taken seriously on the national level, they need to prove they are capable of separating their religion from their roles as public servants.

As governor, Huntsman was able to do so wonderfully – although not initiating or supporting gay marriage legislation, he was a strong proponent of anti-discrimination legislation and has come out in support of civil unions. Steps like these help Mormons be taken more seriously, seemingly without detracting from Huntsman’s own religious views.

Unfortunately, Rep. Chaffetz and Sen. Bennett’s legislation, in addition to the Mormon Church’s spearheading of Proposition 8, solidify views that Mormons could not possibly be trusted in a national office – “Why should anyone respect them as politicians when they cannot even respect the boundary between church and state?” It is one thing to meld the two areas together in one’s own sphere of governance – but it is another to effectively force one’s religious views on the government processes of other jurisdictions. (Now, some may argue that both Chaffetz and Bennett are not injecting their religion into DC’s gay marriage issue, but simply calling for a more democratic process by a popular vote. In response, one only needs to say “Prop 8” and then wonder if the Church is already setting aside funding for the off-chance it goes to popular vote in DC).

There is one place my seemingly dichotomous and unrelated identities converge. As a Mormon, as a resident of DC, and as a member of the LGBT community, I have learned three-fold what it is like to feel as though the larger part of society does not take you seriously, and you are effectively powerless. All three groups are precarious outsiders in the realm of politics, each taking turns scratching at the door, trying different techniques, and finding differing degrees of success. Although it is unlikely that DC residents will see more political power in the near future, there is hope for the other two. In an unexpectedly symbiotic relationship, by supporting the right to political process of the LGBT community, Mormon politicians can slowly garner respect by showcasing their own respect for the separation of church and state, the decisions of other jurisdictions, and civil rights

Chapman is currently a student at Georgetown University Law Center, a former employee of The Carlyle Group, and a former intern for Governor Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. of Utah.


First time here? See what we're all about... Get involved... Send us a tip!...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

3 Comments »

  • Steve Young said:

    Quick piece of trivia: The first Hollywood film to feature a gay character was 1962′s “Advise and Consent” when Utah Senator Brigham Anderson is blackmailed for a gay relationship back in the day. It is rare indeed for your three identities to come together: pick up “Advise and Consent” if you’d like to see someone deal with ‘em in a spectacularly awful fashion.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly, and have to say that your critique of Mormon politicians lines up well with my critique of many gay politicians: in order to be taken seriously, you have to move beyond your stereotype issues. It’s easy to play to your base (as a gay Rep who spend all his soapbox time talking about expanding marriage rights, or as a Mormon Rep babbling about family values) but in order to have a broader appeal you must have a more diverse (and interesting) platform.

    I might ask you what you think of Sen. Harry Reid. I always have a bit of a chuckle when I let myself ponder the fact that the Dem Senate leader (“he must be a crazy liberal!”) is Mormon (“he must be a crazy conservative!”). Does he toe the line well? Or has he gone so far afield from the normal “Mormon issues” that he’s no longer a “Mormon Senator” and is instead a Senator that is Mormon?

  • Sky Daddy said:

    Though I find all religion to be fairly laughable, I would like to point out that Mormonism rates up there with Scientology for most people. So for someone to take a Mormon politician seriously is difficult. To go a little further, I know most politicians are simply paying lip-service to their religion of choice to get elected, but with some Mormons it’s hard to tell. Their religion was created less than 200 years ago and follows an invented history of North America, among other things, and most other religions have difficulty acknowledging Mormonism as legitimate. At least there is some minor historic evidence that some things in the New Testament are valid, and I am speaking primarily of people and places.

    Should we even have to question that a politician who fervently believes a god speaks directly to them is a danger to society? I would cite James Dobson or Fred Phelps as examples of why that thought should be scary.

    George Bush thought he had a mandate from god, and that was more than enough crazy for me. Religion has too much of a hold over our government already.

  • Hans said:

    Though my parents left the church (thankfully) when I was a toddler, I come from a Mormon family that can trace itself back to the first days of Joseph Smith and the Mormon Trail. My extended family remains very Mormon and arch-conservative on social issues, so to say that our reunions are a little tense for me is a bit of an understatement. Thanks for writing this, and I’m glad to see you made it out alright – Gay and Mormon seems to be a pretty nasty combination more often than not.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.