Home » Commentary, Sports
9 December 2009, 9:00 am 2 Comments

On Tiger

Who says gays can’t be sporty? This post was submitted by Arthur D. Hartnett. Tiger

The focus of the sports world since Thanksgiving has been the private life of Tiger Woods. It has now come to light that Tiger, despite being married to a European underwear model (we should all be so lucky) and having two children with Elin Nordegren, has roamed a bit from his marital vows.

You’ll forgive me if I am neither surprised nor really care that much. Though Tiger has always tightly controlled his image, his decision to wed was always a little strange. Elin and her twin sister were au pairs to a Swedish golfer when she was introduced to Tiger in 2003; they wed in 2007. Without real argument, Woods is the greatest golfer who ever lived, and one of the best athletes this country has ever produced.  He is a marketing machine, and getting married hasn’t really increased his market appeal. In fact, one of Tiger’s most famous ad campaigns features a very famously single athlete, who since 1996 has gone from Miss USA to Miss America to Mariah Carey and back again without anyone batting an eyelash. I speak of Derek Jeter, and his primal desires have not hurt his bank account in any way.

Professional male athletes are more often than not big, harmless guys who are very, very, very talented at what they do, but are not particularly bright. They want to do their job, get paid, go out and have fun. The idea of the rich athlete with the happy family is a nice one, but doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense, practically speaking. I don’t need my favorite players on my favorite teams to be committed to monogamy. I need them to play really well and win championships so that I, as a fan, am happy. Tiger owes the public no explanation for what happened between himself and his wife (although he clearly gave the wrong answer when she asked what the text message was if she went after him with a golf club).

Tiger Woods is not a politician railing against the LGBT community, trying to pass anti-gay laws all while hitting on men in an airport bathroom. Tiger Woods is an athlete, has always been apolitical and always wishes to be apolitical. Though the public may want an explanation, they are not entitled to one. It’s juicy gossip, but nothing more. Also, considering that Elin has demanded (and is apparently receiving) a “substantial increase” in her incentives to stay married to Tiger (according to the Chicago Sun-Times), it’s hard to feel truly sorry for her. Yes, no one should be publicly humiliated and it is important (especially given the arguments against same-sex marriage we hear over and over and over and over and over) for wedding vows to be taken seriously, but Elin knew what she was getting into. Their original agreement called for a 10 year marriage in order for a $20 million dollar settlement in divorce. Chump change to Tiger, given that his reported worth is well over $700 million, and if she knew she had to stay married to get at least $20 mil, wouldn’t it stand to reason that she expected him to go out and uh…try other driving ranges?

Tigergate, though fun, is pointless. Countless other highly successful pro athletes have had dozens of ho-bags throughout the history of pro sports. Wilt Chamberlin alleges he slept with over 20,000 women. Babe Ruth and Derek Jeter could argue quantity over quality till the cows come home. Michael Jordan…are you kidding me? The stories out of Chicago are great. If you think that guys like Eli Manning and David Beckham aren’t doing the same thing, you are deluding yourself. Given the context of this situation, the money involved, and the fact that this has nothing to do with anything other than a guy wanting to get some from another women, everyone needs to calm down.


First time here? See what we're all about... Get involved... Send us a tip!...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

2 Comments »

  • J. Clarence said:

    Tiger Woods’s personal saga is only important in the sense that it goes to highlight another classic example of how the supposed sanctity of the institution of marriage is consistently spit upon by heterosexuals, while in the mean time other people who have been in committed relationships for years are denied the law right to do so.

    Of course gay people will also cheat and hurt their loved ones, that is seemingly human nature: stupidity; however, the argument being made is not about some sort of divine blessing but rather legal entitlements.

    The fact that this was a contract marriage further makes the point that heterosexuals role models by their own doing have turned marriage into a publicity. Which just makes First Lady Jenny Sanford of South Carolina look ridiculous when she says it is because of states that passed marriage-equality that her husband cheated on her.

    So it does matter, though not as seriously as the hypocrisy of the so-called “pro-family” elected officials, i.e. Gov. Mark Sanford, Sen. Larry Craig, etc, but rather merely as anecdotal evidence that all same-sex couples in committed relationships want is to get in on the already shit-show that marriage has become, not turn it into one.

  • WholeDC Presents Megan Andelloux — Oh Megan! said:

    [...] Of course! And you can see how it affects us, just look at the recent obsession with Tiger Woods. I think one of the reasons people get so wrapped up in celebrity sex scandals is because they [...]

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.