Home » Commentary, Not Your Average Prom Queen, Uncategorized

Not Your Average Prom Queen: Guys Get Burgers and Girls Get Brooms

10 December 2009, 12:00 pm 6 Comments
This post was submitted by Jean

Women cry, eat bon-bons, watch “Steel Magnolias,” and have an undying love for George Clooney. We also love adorable animals, expensive (diamond) jewelry and shoes. Oh, and marriage and babies.

Of course, this list is not true of all women, some of these things are certainly true of some women, and of those true things, some apply even to me – specifically adorable animals and shoes. These stereotypes come frome depictions of women in movies and in media, jokes we (almost) all find funny on The Simpsons or The Daily Show, and comments many of us make to and about the women in our lives.

While many of these stereotypes come from some truth, there is one stereotype that I’ve seen floppin’ around over the past couple of years in which I cannot believe. A stereotype about which I see no truth. A stereotype that deeply offends me.

I’m talking about the outrageous belief that women have a romantic relationship with cleaning-related products.MopAndBroomForeva

Haven’t you seen these commercials with (for example) a mop lamenting its lost relationship with a woman after she replaces it with a new fancier product? Sure, maybe the women isn’t shedding tears over this breakup but the implication is strong and clear. A duster has had his heart broken by a woman. Seriously.

In advertising, men get to fall in love with a new car or a triple cheeseburger, and we get all turned on by an apple scented air freshener or an extra thick paper towel (I mean, I’m definitely not getting all hot and heavy typing these words.)

The “affection” or “love” depicted in these commercials is the product of simple logic..

Advertisers: “What do men care about?”
Fools: “Men care about cars, about women (sex) and about food!”

With these responses commercials are then crafted. We find ways to make comparison between products and emotions – suddenly we start to see commercials where men are practically fucking a burger, or caressing a car. In these images we feminize the burger and the automobile – if the burger was “male”  the man depicted wouldn’t be ravenously devouring it with an orchestra rising to climax in the background.

Advertisers: “What do women care about?”
Fools: “Women care about keeping a clean house. They also care about taking care of their husband and their children.”

In response, some commercials geared toward women involve romance (not sex usually, women don’t like sex, just romance), or a maternal instinct toward her family that a product enables. They find ways to brings together romance and keeping a clean house. They simulate an orgasm with a shampoo.

The problem with this simple logic?

It is faulty. In sooooo many ways.

1.    Some men are gay and feminizing products does not make them appealing.
2.    Men and women both have slightly deeper needs than sexual attraction or the desire to take care of their family (respectively).
3.    Women like sex. And also using a “romantic” relationship between a woman and any product is just creepy.
4.    Cleaning products in no way, shape, or form symbolize romantic or sexual items for women.
5.    Some women are not maternal and do not believe all women should be treated like they were born to be homemakers and mothers.
6.    Just so many more.

A slightly more dated commercial memory for me involves the following scenario:
Two dudes are sitting at a bar, barely enjoying a non-name brand beer. They decide/or someone offers them a couple of X name-brand beers. They crack the tops of their bottles and instantly the bar is converted to a beach, complete with Hawaiian shirts and 25-30 blond, busty girls falling all over these two oafs. This is the best moment of their lives. They cheers, and secretly promise themselves to never stray from X name brand again.

A commercial like that is/was heteronormative almost to the point of being homophobic— and certainly sexist. The girls didn’t really have a choice about being there, they only exist as a man’s fantasy (with no purpose of their own). And, like they’d ever go for these guys! (Well, maybe they would, on TV). In addition, we never saw a couple of girls bust open some beers and a gaggle of bare-chested guys come rolling out? Or a the Swedish Bikini Team. We never saw two guys suddenly surprised with a slew of sexy cowboys. At least straight guys get to enjoy sexuality in advertising, I think the last time girls got to be even a little bit sexual in a commercial was the old Diet Coke Break commercial.

None of this is fair. Advertisers think we are all they same, and that we are all stupid. Do we just suck it up? Do we boycott? Will this ever change?

Bookmark and Share
Related Posts with Thumbnails

6 Comments »

  • michael said:

    I think that advertisers have tapped into the deepest, basest human behavioral patterns: sex and sex-related desires. Unfortunately, hetero assumptions about sex obviously don’t apply to all of us, and result in a big turn-off for those queer-minded individuals. However, I don’t know that advertisers will ever steer clear of using sex (for men) and romance (for women) as marketing strategies. Sex sells, and there’s not much we can do about it. Short of pan-sexual advertising, I can’t foresee any changes in this regard, but instead things just getting worse.

    I can recall an old Peppermint Patty commercial where a woman gets “blown away” by the cool freshness of the candy. I think I recall her having a quasi-orgasm while experiencing the minty-freshness. Women and sex aren’t completely ignored in advertising. However, perhaps only the brave/desperate employ it.

  • Kyle said:

    Television always will cater to the lowest common denominator. Too many times I’ve watched a show only to get to the end of the hour and think, what the hell did I just watch? Advertisers recognize that the lowest common denominator reaches the widest audience. Therefore most commercials suck (even the ones that aren’t overtly expensive).

    Even the commercials that are marginally better (the e-Trade baby still cracks me up) usually have better incarnations online. Just look up the e-Trade baby page on Youtube.

    Which brings me to my real point: the best commercials never appear on tv. They’re online. I saw a commercial for a gaming system that was simply amazing in it’s use of special effects and gorgeous photography. It was never meant to be aired, I suspect.

    Finally, there is a truism in advertising that a commercial doesn’t always have to be enjoyable to get it’s point across. The commercials of the cleaning products feeling jilted by the women are abominable, but by God, you won’t forget them for a very long time. So in that sense, they are successful.

  • Drew said:

    The trouble with those commercials is that I empathize with the mop. After all that they’ve been through together, I can’t believe that woman just walked away and took up with that trampy Swiffer.

  • Nick said:

    Yeah, Michael: Sex does sell, as Madonna, countless others, and most recently Lady Gaga are proving. However, for me, my favorite commercials are never the ones with undertones (or fog horns) of sex. It’s not that I’m a prude who just gets turn-off by the idea of other people using sexual attraction to sell products. But, as Jean is saying, there are just SO MANY of them, that beyond being offensive, they aren’t original. The really unique commercials, the ones that make me want to Shhhhsh anyone around me, are the rare commercials which have actually found a way to be thematically pure–match their emotional content with the graphics with the voiceover script with their product. See this newish American Express commercial for example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9LzO_nLVIc

    Now that is the advertising I want to buy into.

    Even though, as Kyle rightly reports, unenjoyable commercials still sell ideas/products, I always feel superior when I see I good commercial for an idea that I do really like. I just wish there were more of them.

  • stephanie said:

    this reminds me of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMRDLCR8vAE

  • ZorraThinkTank said:

    Sometimes sex sells and sometimes it doesn’t.

    IMHO
    this one doesn’t
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5mdDdE80iY

    this one does
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=km6tGDlYsew
    at least to heterosexual women

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia theme by Michael Hutagalung -->