Gay Geekery: Gay GLEEkery – The Politics of Minority Casting
Episode seven of the new Fox musical comedy, Glee, was the first time we saw an in-text acknowledgment of the number of minority kids in the cast. The cheerleading coach-cum-co-director, Sue Sylvester, separates out the marginalized students for a special performance number, tersely calling them out, “Santana. Wheels. Gay kid. Asian. Other Asian. Aretha. Shaft.”
Despite the awkward stereotyping that, to be fair, is completely in-character for Sue, this moment inspired cheers from many progressives. We’re not used to seeing such diversity on a major network program, and I, at least, have come to expect that these kinds of roll-calls will be limited to racial minorities and maybe queers. For Glee, then, I was thrilled the producers included Artie, a white straight male character, because of his disability identity around his use of a wheelchair.
Unfortunately, this didn’t mean Artie was a fully fleshed out character. At that time, we knew virtually nothing about him. It wasn’t until last week that viewers finally got an episode focusing closely on Artie’s story and, to many fans’ squealing delight, his romantic entanglements. The only problem that emerged, then, was that as the character came further into focus, so did the fact that Kevin McHale, his actor, does not actually have any mobility-related disabilities. This brings up the question, if a show is going to feature a diverse set of characters, is it also obligated to employ a diverse set of actors?
Although I’m frequently met with resistance on this point, my answer is generally a resounding yes. Of course, acting is all about getting inside someone else’s head and I would never say that minorities are so different that it is impossible for others to come to identity with their experience and channel that into their work. Rather, I am more concerned about the actors out there who, in this case, do have disabilities and the challenges they must face in finding roles. I can only imagine that even the most talented actors who use wheelchairs face the constant problem of casting directors who say that a role wasn’t written for a person with a disability. Similarly, though I think more in-roads may have been made over the years, I think we can all imagine actresses receiving the comment that a character wasn’t written to be butch or Black or Arab-American. For minorities in Hollywood, then, being repeatedly forced into identity boxes should at least mean that they get dropped into the few roles that really are written to be them.
Beyond the issue of allowing disability-identified actors to pursue their dreams, I also do think that actors who have experienced minoritization have a special insight into these characters and may be able to better embody their experience in subtle ways that others don’t see. I wonder what the reaction of the gay community would be, for example, if Kurt Hummel were portrayed by someone known to be straight. It would probably not be cause for too much alarm (Eric McCormack from Will and Grace was never the one causing controversy in that show), but would his performance lose something, something even vaguely affective we can’t quite put our fingers on? Incidentally, I do not profess to know Chris Colfer’s sexuality, but I do know that I take deep pleasure in his gender performance and feel connected to him through his femininity where I often feel, instead, concerned about being ocked. And although this is operating on a strange and emotional level, it is none the less true that this prompts my belief that he is acting from his own experience of queerness.
For Glee, the racial and ethnic minority kids are all played by actors of color, and it’s great to see a Latina, two Asian-Americans of either gender, and two black characters, even though Matt has yet to get a line. Outside of Glee, though, the unfortunate reality is that even appropriate racial casting, which one might take for granted is not always so. Recently, the live-action adaptation of Avatar: The Last Airbender has caused controversy because the clearly Asian and Inuit-inspired civilizations of the animated show were replaced largely by white actors and actresses. The recent Dragon Ball film did the same as have innumerable other geek-oriented moving image texts – King of Fighters, Chun Li , The Weapon. The forthcoming video game-based Prince of Persia will reportedly feature no actual Persian actors or actresses, and this week’s big release, New Moon, the second installment of The Twilight Saga, will see Taylor Lautner’s reprisal of the role of Jacob Black, a non-American Indian playing a Quileute boy.
The level of offensiveness is variable. When producers cast Zhang Ziyi, a Chinese actress, in the lead role of the American film adaptation of Memoirs of a Geisha, a Japanese story, many read their decision as a clear indication that they thought all Asians looked and sounded alike and were therefore interchangeable. On the other hand, in a case like Artie’s, it may be easier to see it as a missed opportunity. Having written the character, the Glee creators had an excellent chance to highlight a young actor’s talents that may have been over looked, but they didn’t. They may or may not have aided in the creation of a fierce community advocate on the level of Chris Burke (Life Goes On, Touched by an Angel), but either way they have done a small disservice to the disability community and to all of us as fans and viewers, which is really a shame set against all the great work being done with this show.

Actresses and actors from left to right, top to bottom: Naya Rivera, Kevin McHale, Chris Colfer, Jenna Ushkowitz, Harry Shum, Amber Riley, and Dijon Talton

I thought Bitch had a well-written take on the episode in Glee and the treatment of minority folks on the show in general.
I’ll admit to generally turning my brain off when it comes to dissecting media representations (because otherwise I’d be pissed off all the time). However, as much as I enjoy Glee, the Pokemon theory of diversity (“Gotta catch ‘em all!”) and the accompanying easy slide into tokenisation is irritating.
Great shout our for corky! ! ! ! great article
As I’ve said before, I’m not sure how I feel about this: while it’s one thing to have more avenues for roles of minority actors (ability, gender preentation, trans, people of color etc.), one runs the risk of getting into the mindset that if such roles are written, only the particular type of minority can be cast for it. And, while this might seem to be a logical fallacy, it can lead to the belief that minority actors can ONLY be cast in roles written specifically for that type of minority — and that the roles in which they are cast revolve too much around their minority identity.
Though in a show like Glee, where all these minority characters (if not actors, in all cases) are present, I think that has already happened to a large extent: their story focuses seem to revolve around their minority identities. Not so for Puck, Rachel, Quinn (unless teenage mother is an identity), Sue, Will, Finn. The principal has a personality beyond being Desi, and the Asian girl has an identity beyond being Asian — but those seem to the only two that is even somewhat explored for (unless you count the Jewish people). And even then it remains problematic, because it’s Asians and Jews: the two so-called model minorities.
Rant over. Let’s talk about this when we meet next.
I have to leave my brain behind to enjoy shows!
Actors should be hired based on their abilities and merits, not because they are handicapped or of a particular race/ethnicity/etc. If an able-bodied actor can sing and act the pants off any of any disabled actors trying for the part, then the able-bodied actor deserves the part. That’s all there is to it.
Maybe the disabled character can bring a subtle nuance to the character, but if they aren’t up to the talent level of the rest of the cast then it’s going to bring the show down a notch.
I love Glee, and this is a great article. I agree with your observation about minority actors having fewer opportunities and your comments about Colfer’s performance resonating with you due to his feminine presentation.
I think another issue about resonation and authenticity in acting can be better understood when you look at the gaze of the audience and which viewers’ opinions are being heard. For example, many people will say, it doesn’t matter if a person is disabled, an actor will be able to portray any character if s/he has skill. But there are nuances for a disabled theater-goer that might not ring true, where the general audience would be sold on the performance. Similar to gaydar perhaps, the little cues and body language that might be invisible to most people.
Another example would be Deaf actors not being hired for roles of Deaf people (the New York Times recently had two posts about this related to The Heart is a Lonely Hunter and The Miracle Worker). While a lot of people would argue that any skilled actor could play a Deaf role, I would say that those not Deaf or in the Deaf culture might be convinced, but a Deaf audience would not find the performance authentic. It’s hard to make this kind of argument heard though, if the minority sees something the majority of people overlook.
Leave your response!
What is TNG?
Find TNG Online
Subscribe to TNG Emails
- Shh! Glenn can hear you.Shh! Glenn can hear you.
[No Comments]
- DC Trans Coalition: Today! DCTC…DC Trans Coalition: Today! DCTC testifying before the DC Council about the DC jails
[No Comments]
- Ask me!Ask me!
[No Comments]
- That’s Gay! Awards ShowsThat’s Gay! Awards Shows
[No Comments]
- Granny DJ Rocks ParisGranny DJ Rocks Paris
[No Comments]
- It’d be great if the sponge…It’d be great if the sponge cleaned itself..
[No Comments]
- genderforkgenderfork
[No Comments]
- My cat is averageMy cat is average
[No Comments]
- Peter Adams – Bending SkyPeter Adams – Bending Sky
[No Comments]
- Through the looking glassThrough the looking glass
[No Comments]
More in Chatterbox...Recent Coments
Most Viewed
Most Commented