It's Easy Being Green: Queer and Green, an Oxymoron?

As I stated in my introductory column last week, I have been an environmentalist since high school, and was surprised to find when I came out that there is not a large overlap between the environmental and queer communities. I had assumed that other queer folk would have had experiences similar to mine: questioning sexual identity and attraction at an early age resulting in a process of questioning other norms, generating more progressiveness in queer people in general.
This was not what I found when coming out of my shell and trying to meet queer people and explore gay culture. Instead, I discovered a culture based on instant gratification and self-satisfaction at the expense of all others, including “friends.” If the queer people I met couldn’t treat their actual friends with kindness and compassion, how could they embrace the seemingly abstract concept of being friends of the Earth and treat our planet as something precious, to be respected, instead of another source of endless pleasure, just another resource to be tapped.
It’s likely that the story of why there are few environmental queers is analogous to why mainstream gay culture itself is currently less than progressive. In general queer people, and perhaps especially gay men, are robbed of the joys and pains of exploring sexuality and relationships in their teen years. Those years and years of repression, self-denial and living in fear of being discovered cannot easily be undone.
(As a gay man, I can’t speak for queer women and trans-folk. I have a sense that lesbian culture tends to be more progressive, possibly resulting from the general acceptability of intimacy between girls, whereas masculinity and bravado prevent boys from showing affection, including that brought on by nascent homosexual desires, to one another. See below for my theory how childhood repression results in lack of progressiveness. I invite any trans-folk to suggest how the trans-experience makes them more or less likely to be progressive.)
It’s very true that in many situations one must take care of themselves before they bother to take care of others. Just like the pre-flight check-list statement of putting on your own oxygen mask before assisting others with their masks, you must look out for yourself before you have the capacity (or even the ability) to help other people. In the above example, if all the adults put oxygen masks on the kids before themselves, you could end up with an airplane full of dead adults (since the kids can’t reach the masks to put them on the adults). So from this perspective, it makes sense that queer people would be less likely to be stewards of the environment: they’re too busy putting on their own masks.
It’s my opinion that the approaches that most of us take when we do finally come out and begin to make up for lost time, the masks we put on, do little to heal the actual wounds but instead only treat the symptoms. To extend the metaphor, we’re wearing the oxygen masks when instead we need to team up and plug the hole in the side of the plane. While it might be different for the 14 year-olds coming out today, those of us not lucky enough to grow up in gay-friendly times and places are most likely filling our lives with distractions that solve the short-term need for comfort and pleasure while ignoring the longer term need for healing and community.
So that’s my working theory: queer people in general are less capable of caring about the Earth because they are too busy trying to make up for lost time. They can’t be true friends of others and the planet because they are spending all their energy making sure they’re getting their needs met. However, it’s my opinion that the approach people take — the self-centered, self-satisfaction approach — does little to heal and does everything to perpetuate the damage to our individual psyches. If we are running around looking after ourselves at the expense of everyone else, then everyone is constantly being hurt by everyone else, undoing all the self-healing we try to apply.
The solution to all this mess — to this constant game of self-satisfaction while shitting all over one another and our planet — is for everyone to start caring about everyone else, the planet included. Imagine a world where everyone is looking out for you. Really. Close our eyes and imagine that everyone in your community has your back. You can stop spending so much time looking after yourself, because everyone is doing it for you. That frees up so much time and energy for you to start caring about others as well, and that includes the planet we call home.
It’s actually a known economic fact that multi-actor systems reach optimal solutions when the actors work with one another instead of against. This concept is what won John Nash his Nobel prize in Economics. The movie about his life, A Beautiful Mind, used a very simple example to describe this theory. Four guy friends are at a bar, and five women walk in, one of whom is a 10 and the others are 8s. Standard economic theory at the time dictated that all 4 men should vie for the affections of the most beautiful woman, with a potential pay-off of 10, and the rest of the guys would end up with the 8s. Nash suggested an alternative theory, that the four guys should court the four 8s. The general concept being that each guy is more likely to end up with a date for the night than under the traditional theory, where all fight against each other for the 10 and no one will get her, so then they then court the 8s who would likely be pissed at being everyone’s second choice. Chances are, he reasoned, that all 5 women would walk out together, leaving the guys dateless. Screw my description, and watch the video yourself.
This is where community-building comes in, where TNG comes in. How can we understand each others needs and work together better towards a common goal if we don’t know one another and what each other’s motivations are? How can we colaborate and work towards a better society and a cleaner planet if we are struggling against one another all the time? The first step towards living a greener life is for us to shed our sense of entitlement, the making up for lost time, the desire to self-actualize at the expense of our friends, neighbors, fellow humans and mother Earth. Once we move beyond only looking after ourselves, we can start caring for one another.
This is what I try to do. This it my motivation for creating spaces, online and in the real world, where queer people from different backgrounds can interact and find commonalities. We can only benefit from working together, and we can only work together if we know one another. If you are even the least bit interested in breaking out of the cycle of self-gratification at the expense of others, start visualizing all members of our community as allies. Ask yourself how your actions contribute or detract from that community. Try to recognize and appreciate when others’ actions benefit you. Work on the realization that either we all win together, or no one wins at all. Then tune in each Monday for more theory and practice on creating a queer green community.
First time here? See what we're all about... Get involved... Send us a tip!...

First off, I am glad you’re taking the time to explore something kinda new like this, so thanks for opening the discussion. I think you’ve got some good insights in here, but I think we should just try to avoid too much generalization.
I guess I’m referring to your idea that it’s only after we come out that we then turn to a life of distractions, excess, etc.. For me (who sees coming out more as a process than an event), I think I was actually trying to delude myself more as a closeted gay man. I was constantly trying to keep up with the guys I was hanging out with, much more prone to trying substances, etc.
It was actually after I started to come out (in my case, this was also into a relationship and a sense of reconciliation with my faith) that I think I became a bit more level-headed. I dropped a lot of the fake masks that I had been wearing and became a lot more interested and directly involved in social justice issues (for me, more economic justice in focus, but also environmental justice, queer rights, anti-war, etc).
So maybe it would be useful to think of the scenario in which someone “comes out” perhaps more superficially into whatever we want to call the excessive, consumption driven type of a gay lifestyle, as maybe not truly coming out? Maybe its really just a “covering up” instead of really “coming out.”?
I think your article is excellent in the sense that it could be pushing us to re-think what it means to come out as queer.
Just don’t go too far with the whole loving the animals thing.. or you’ll get James Dobson thinking that we really are in favor of bestiality! OK OK totally inappropriate but I couldn’t resist :)
I sometimes think we have to work even harder than straight people at thinking outside our own individualized, ego-centric world views. I recognize that the queer pioneer Harry Hay believed gay people were especially endowed with the ability for what he called “subject-subject” consciousness (i.e., the ability to see other people as sovereign entities with equal call to dignity as our own selves), but my experience in the “community” has been quite the opposite. We all tend to treat everyone and everything around us as objects that either aid, impede or are indifferent to our individualized potential for pleasure. This makes sense since our “community” is based solely on the objects of our desire (i.e., we desire those of our own sex). We have allowed ourselves the freedom to believe in and express those desires. But now, somehow, we have to grow up and learn to curb most of our desires, materialistic and sexual (after all, not only should we not have every physical item we want, we should not have every human being we want, either). We have a lot of work to do, IMHO.
michael, this is an interesting series, one in which i would have completely agreed with a year ago. i cant wait to read the next ones, but your argument just isn’t convincing me.
why can’t the queer community be more progressive and green? it seems your answer revolves around this: “questioning sexual identity and attraction at an early age resulting in a process of questioning other norms, generating more progressiveness in queer people in general.” i used to believe that gay people are on the edge of society, endowed with a unique perspective that society just isn’t working for us. this perspective would allow us to then see that society isn’t working for a lot of people, as well as the earth. but i really feel that this notion to bridge the gap between gay issues/problems and OTHER issues/problems is naively idealistic.
when it comes to angst, gay people are exactly like straight people. we are concerned about our own problems, and WON’T really care about other’s. Ronald Gottesman, who wrote an introduction to ‘The Jungle’, said this about making public changes:
“involve the public in the pain caused by the deficiency in need of remedy”
this is profound, and hasn’t changed a bit in 100 years. i take this to mean that people won’t care about a problem UNLESS it effects them. the gay community as a whole, i believe, really won’t care about other problems (even with their unique perspective and ability to question sexual norms) until it starts to hurt them. (this is a very pessimistic notion, but one that i feel does have solutions.)
the ability to bridge the gap between our gay problems and other social problems requires a lot in a person. while a unique perspective does help, it also requires education, passion, and the ability to believe that my actions can make a difference. your post seems to be missing these elements.
finally: “Imagine a world where everyone is looking out for you. Really. Close our eyes and imagine that everyone in your community has your back.”
…this is the antithesis to our form of capitalism. capitalism relies on the notion that we are all complete and utter individuals, who must do anything to get our share of the resources. (any sense that the market will work for the common good is completely secondary to fulfilling our individual desires.) this is ultimately why i believe that people won’t care about other social problems. there is no sense of group responsibility.
im sorry for writing so much. i hope you read this michael. if you could, can you address WHY queer people should choose green issues over other issues? (why not homelessness, for example) again, its only because i liked your posts that i am criticizing them.
Good points in this post, but I wonder if it is more with the idea that the gay world is a microcosm of the rest of the world, 10 percent. and that the ratio of people who care about environmental issues to those who don’t care about them are the same. I do agree with you that people whose needs aren’t met do end up being more self absorbed. Living a lie (living straight) in the developmental years really can mess some people up too. Capitalist media prey on gay people now and promotes a consumeristic lifestyle, and so this is where so many gay people learn about being gay. It is true though that the population needs to be compassionate, and maybe there is a way to promote a more caring lifestyle, maybe through a magazine or programs. I don’t really know, I would like to think that for all of the images of really boring gay guys that go clubbing and are shallow, there is an equal amount or more who are somewhere else being thoughtful and living a more authentic life.
Leave your response!
Recent Coments
Most Commented
Most Viewed - 30 Days