Home » Commentary
16 December 2008, 6:00 pm 9 Comments

Commentary: The Gay Greats: Why Should it Matter?


TNG Contributor “David Stalling” blogs at outintothewilds.

When I was young and naïve I did something I regret: I joined the Marine Corps. I was cocky, considered myself tough, and bought into a lot of bullshit (unfortunately, still common) myths and misconceptions of manhood. Like most 20-year-olds, I was confused; I thought learning to kill and going to war might clarify things.

The Marine Corps emphasizes pride and tradition, forcing a lot of distorted history into young brains during boot camp. I learned all about past warriors, medal-of-honor winners and men who influenced and shaped the Corps, the U.S. Military and warfare in general. And, of course, I wanted to be like them. One such “hero” was Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben.

A Prussian military officer, von Steuben distinguished himself in the Seven Years War and served under Frederick the Great. But he was discharged in 1763 and fled to France, where, years later, he met Benjamin Franklin, who urged George Washington to recruit von Steuben to train rebellious farmers into a proficient, disciplined enough force to take on the British. And so he did. Arriving to the colonies in 1777, he began training troops at Valley Forge in the winter of 1778. He did a pretty good job: von Steuben is widely considered the second-most-indispensable hero of the American Revolution after Washington. I learned that in boot camp.

What I didn’t learn until years later is this: von Steuben was gay.

Most biographies of Steuben cautiously state that his homosexuality is “speculative.” But here’s a bit of evidence: He was discharged from the Prussian army and fled Germany because he was accused of “indiscretions” with “several young men;” He arrived in America with a “handsome” 17-year old Frenchman he was unusually close to; He became the protégé of Pierre L’Enfant (another gay man who George Washington hired to design our nation’s Capitol city); He settled in New York (a gay-friendly city even then) and hung out in gay “social sets;” He died a bachelor in 1794 and left all his property to two men he was close too. And so on. Sounds pretty gay to me.

“Gay propaganda,” I’ve been told, when I bring up such things. “Sketchy and speculative” at best. Perhaps. But I can relate to von Steuben: Not only did I also serve honorably in the U.S. armed forces, but I share his apparent fondness for young men. Maybe I (and other gays) look a bit too reaffirmingly into such matters? There’s evidence Lincoln was gay, as well as “bachelor President” James Buchannan, and Frederick the Great and Alexander the Great and other greats who were likely gay greats. Why should it matter? Well, it matters because it shouldn’t matter.

To suggest a historical figure may have been gay seems akin to accusations of murder, or thievery, or some fundamental flaw in their character. Particularly if they don’t fit the stereotype. Sure, we don’t speculate if historical figures were straight. It requires no solid evidence to attribute what most of society considers “good” traits to our heroes, even when proven false. Even though we know George Washington didn’t really cut the cherry tree down, and likely told a few fibs in his life (who hasn’t?) we still pass the story on as a lesson in honesty and integrity. The Marine Corps puts strong emphasis on honesty and integrity; unless, of course, you’re gay. Homosexuality has been viewed as a flaw, a crime, and such serious allegations require solid proof: innocent until proven guilty.

In von Steuben’s day, there were no terms to describe same-sex attraction, though it might be said such men had an “abstracted manner” or were “affected.” It was in von Steuben’s homeland, Prussia—while arguing to repeal of sodomy laws in 1869—that Karl Maria Benkert coined the term “homosexuality.” When I was a teenager and felt freakish, sick and confused about my attraction towards men, I did not know what “gay” meant. I occasionally heard the terms “fairy” and “light in the loafers,” as my dad used to say. I knew I wasn’t one of those. I knew I wasn’t like Elton John or Liberace. I played football, I wore hiking boots.

I felt sick, and thought I could beat it. What better place to prove I was a tough, macho straight guy than the Marine Corps? Why not follow in the footsteps of other tough, macho heroes like, well, like von Steuben? Maybe if I had known about the speculations, maybe if I had been taught that men like Lincoln and Buchannan and Alex and Freddy the Greats were likely gay, maybe I would have felt a bit more secure and comfortable with my own self. Just as Marines are motivated by past warriors; just as blacks and women are inspired by leaders who came before them, it helps (at least for me) to know there were people like von Steuben. We don’t hesitate to talk about the great women behind the great men of history, and the influence they may have had. What influence did that young handsome Frenchman have on von Steuben? Perhaps, he too is a hero? Who were the great men behind Lincoln and Buchannan and the Greats? And why are we so reluctant to teach such things? Why the shame? Why the cynicism? Why should it matter?

I spent much of my life in various stages of denial, suppression and living a secret, double-life. My shadows loomed large with shame, guilt and sorrow. There have been mental and emotional consequences in pretending to be something I’m not. If I had been more secure in my manhood, more understanding and comfortable with whom I am, I likely would not have felt the need to prove some misguided notions of manhood. I doubt I would have joined the Marine Corps. And even if I did, I would not have done the things I did.

Since I came “out,” I have helped change a lot of people’s views about being gay. I don’t fit the “stereotypes,” I am told. “You don’t act gay,” people tell me. Yet I fall in love with men. I have sex with men. That’s pretty damn gay. I have a job now in which I play on my Marine Corps special-ops background to persuade people that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy ought to be repealed, and that gays should be able to serve openly and honestly, and be treated equally and fairly, in the very armed forces von Steuben helped create. I am uncomfortable with the role. I still feel like I am acting. Certainly, gay people should not be discharged from the military for being gay. But why the hell would they want to serve in the military? Why would anyone—gay straight or otherwise—want to learn to kill? I wish I hadn’t.

Perhaps I am non-stereotypical because I never felt comfortable being stereotypical. It seems a bit twisted that my defiance of the stereotype, derived from pretense based on fear of an ignorant, non-acceptant society, now helps create awareness and acceptance. Maybe Elton John and Liberace should have been my role models. Perhaps I should have worn light loafers. Or better yet, maybe our society should teach the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth, and help people grow up more comfortable with whoever they are.

Certainly, I would have lived a healthier life more true to myself. Maybe von Steuben would have lived differently, as well, if his “abstract manner” were seen as natural and normal. But that’s all in the past, as they say, history. If von Steuben hadn’t lived the life he did perhaps we would not have gained independence from Britain and arisen as a nation dedicated to the ideals of liberty. Ironically, in von Steuben’s homeland a gay person can now serve openly in the military. Here, in the good-ole-U.S. of A.—in which von Steuben played such a pivotal role in the fight for freedom—you can’t. Fortuna
tely, there are still heroes amongst us who continue the quest for equality. Some of them are gay.

Postscript: The other day I walked to Lafayette Park in DC to check out a statue of von Steuben. He’s depicted sitting down, clad in little but a helmet, reaching out to a muscular, toned, naked young soldier holding a large sharp sword pointed towards von Steuben’s crotch. The inscription reads: *MILITARY*INSTRVCTION* Nearby, I saw two hot guys holding hands. It was beautiful.


First time here? See what we're all about... Get involved... Send us a tip!...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

9 Comments »

  • Philip said:

    You beat me to von Steuben, David — great piece! Scratch that one off my list of potential “Hidden History” columns! His is a wonderful story, full of pederasty, military discipline, and saving the Continental Army’s bacon post-Valley Forge. The statue in Lafayette Park is one of the wildest, strangest pieces of statuary in D.C. It’s as though the sculptor knew von Steuben’s full story, with that “military instruction” side alluding to the pederastic ideal of “Greek love,” although it may have been a piece of standard classical iconography.

  • Clearlyhere said:

    Good story, very personal and clear.

    I am always curious about the history I wasn’t taught in school. From idealize versions of our treatment of Native Americans to the sexual proclivities of our presidents, it is nice to get the complicated picture. I will look for the statue sometime.

  • ben jones said:

    Fascinating piece. As someone struggling with the shame and guilt I’ve accumulated growing up in rural America, I really appreciate hearing these types of stories. It’s comforting to know I’m the only one dealing with these things, nice not to be alone.

  • Greg Fletcher-Marzullo said:

    I was really moved by your viewpoint and experience, thank you.

    As one of the more stereotypical types, it’s very heartening to me that you’re out there.

    Also, this statue has cracked me up for years! The irony certainly is deep…

  • Greg Fletcher-Marzullo said:

    I was really moved by your viewpoint and experience, thank you.

    As one of the more stereotypical types, it’s very heartening to me that you’re out there.

    Also, this statue has cracked me up for years! The irony certainly is deep…

  • Steven said:

    It’s interesting reading this immediately after watching the video above about the historical Jesus. I think there are some real parallels, in the sense that both are about our powerful need for affirming myths, and how that need compels us to play all sorts of games with history.

    I don’t know any more about von Stueben than what you’re written here, but in many of these cases what people do is they take certain historical details (like, in Lincoln’s case, for example, that he shared a bed with a male friend), consider them in a contemporary context (I don’t know anybody who’s not gay who shares a bed with another man), and conclude: this guy was gay. If we look closer, we find out that it was much more common for male friends to sleep together at that time, but we leave that part out because it doesn’t support the story we want to believe.

    It’s shoddy scholarship, but it serves an urgent purpose, as we can see by how meaningful this story is to you.

    I’ve been thinking lately that in modern times with carbon dating and all sorts of digital technologies that make it easier for us to verify history, we’ve lost our sense of what myths are. We see everything as either true or false, rather than recognizing that there are different kinds of truth. We think of myths as lies, things to be debunked, rather than as stories that help us in some way to live our lives.

    Anyway, thanks for this post. I learned some stuff I didn’t know!

  • adam isn't here said:

    yup, david’s alright by me. and this has been my favourite statue in DC since the first time i noticed it. and actually (now that i think of it) the day that i noticed it was the same day as the new gay day at rock creek park. my visiting friend and i took all sorts of lewdly posed photos in front of it.

  • adam isn't here said:

    yup, david’s alright by me. and this has been my favourite statue in DC since the first time i noticed it. and actually (now that i think of it) the day that i noticed it was the same day as the new gay day at rock creek park. my visiting friend and i took all sorts of lewdly posed photos in front of it.

  • Ed said:

    Awesome piece! Thanks!

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.