Home » Commentary

World War G

21 October 2008, 1:00 pm 18 Comments

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZuK_wYrqp8&hl=en&fs=1]

This post was submitted by TNG reader “Christopher.”

A friend sent me this YouTube video the other night as I was writing a paper, and because generally YouTube videos are more entertaining than writing essays (yes, even on the eleventh hour before they are due) I of course clicked and watched.

At first I was startled at the lack of sensitivity to us gays, and the display of the all too prevalent adolescent homophobia, i.e. a straight guy hitting a queer in the head with a shovel. I was appalled. This video was symptomatic of a culture of intolerance and heteronormative gender expectations and blah blah blah. “This would never be made about black people! Or Jewish people!” But then it occurred to me that I may have missed the satire of it. Being a gay man hailing originally from the midwest, where being open is still an issue in many areas, I feel like I might be over-sensitive to what could possibly be a good-natured lampoon. The other, more cautious part of me wonders, in a world where, despite our visibility and accomplishments, we still don’t have equal rights as a community, can we be over-sensitive? Perhaps I’m being too fair to those who are unfair to us. What exactly were these filmmakers thinking?

The video comes from the collaborative sketch comedy duo Aaron Fronk and Vinny DeGaetano at FNDfilms.com. These were my (correct or incorrect) snap judgments of these guys:

1. Immature and genuinely homophobic hetero dudes
2. Enlightened friends or allies making a good-natured jab
3. Intelligent gents willing to make a statement

The core of The New Gay ideology seems to me to be about a kind of alternative post-gay cultural sensibility. Rock on. Knowing that there are groups like us out there now, how are we supposed to take this kind of cultural nugget?

The thing to me seems to be the intention of the film-makers. If this were two straight guys making fun of gays using trite and easy stereotypes, I would be offended, and also bored. Shame on you, you ought to know better, 21st Century straighties. We’ve all seen this kind of attitude before. But what if this video is intended to make a comment about mainstream gay culture, to critique?

The metaphor is in this case direct. The zombie (stereotypical queer) takes over, while the orientationally unidentified human looks on in horror. Depths of personality evaporate as The Gay Lifestyle sucks away your humanity. The original criticism the zombie has provided to modern culture, now applied to the current state of materialistic, shallow and sex-crazed gay culture. And, to be fair, to two main characters never make a statement about their own sexuality. Could these (possibly straight) guys be trying to help us get over ourselves?

My questions still remain. With the world the shape it is in today, can this video be anything but offensive? Can this video be anything but funny or witty? Does the intention or identity of the film maker matter? Can the video still offer a critique, even if it was indeed made by some slightly homophobic straight guys? The state of gay culture informs how we take these things; perhaps only once we move past the stereotypes can we make fun of them. Or perhaps we move past by stereotypes by making fun.

I guess I am confused because I still don’t know for sure: where are we and how far have we really come?

What do you think?

Bookmark and Share
Related Posts with Thumbnails

18 Comments »

  • BlueSeqPerl said:

    I would say it was option 2. Allies making good-natured jab. Generation Y straight guys usually don’t care about us homos unless they crazy social conservatives. We live in a world where shows like Family Guy, South Park, and Drawn Together make fun of everyone. I guess to find out their true cause is to see if they made any other videos on other subjects in same light or not. If you cannot, I personally would say that the video was just being silly.

  • Anonymous said:

    I thought it was just dumb and humorless. I mean, for that much effort you would think they could be a little more creative than dredging up the same setreotypical jokes everyones heard on the simpsons or family guy or even snl. My position, whether it’s intentionally mean spirited or not, is to not give it the power to effect you anymore than it would effect a straight person watching something like that.

  • Hans N. said:

    Correct or not, I didn’t see it as referring to all gay men, just the ones who blindly follow every mainstream gay trend.

  • Andrew Pendleton said:

    This doesn’t look like it’ll be a good movie, but that said, I don’t think any harm is meant by it. I think a lot of our generation’s humor is a deliberate reaction to the obsession with political correctness that characterized the ’90s, and lots of comedians try and push the boundaries of taste to that end. Consider Dave Chappelle and Sarah Silverman, or movies like Harold and Kumar. Despite your protestations to the contrary, I could definitely see a race version of this appearing on Chappelle, with white people being turned into black people or vice versa.

  • adam isn't here said:

    i watched twice just to be sure. it’s funny. also the guy in the hat is cute.

  • adam isn't here said:

    i watched twice just to be sure. it’s funny. also the guy in the hat is cute.

  • adam isn't here said:

    i watched twice just to be sure. it’s funny. also the guy in the hat is cute.

  • adam isn't here said:

    i watched twice just to be sure. it’s funny. also the guy in the hat is cute.

  • adam isn't here said:

    i watched twice just to be sure. it’s funny. also the guy in the hat is cute.

  • adam isn't here said:

    i watched twice just to be sure. it’s funny. also the guy in the hat is cute.

  • Anonymous said:

    If you didn't like that, then definatly don't watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcRW_JezCwA&feature=user

  • Cordell said:

    What does being gay have to do with being black or jewish? Gay is a lifestyle. Black and Jew are races. Comparing making fun of a lifestyle to a race as being the same thing is politically incorrect and annoying.

  • Cordell said:

    What does being gay have to do with being black or jewish? Gay is a lifestyle. Black and Jew are races. Comparing making fun of a lifestyle to a race as being the same thing is politically incorrect and annoying.

  • Anonymous said:

    re: Cordell

    “What does being gay have to do with being black or jewish? Gay is a lifestyle. Black and Jew are races. Comparing making fun of a lifestyle to a race as being the same thing is politically incorrect and annoying.

    Gay is NOT a “lifestyle”. It is a sexual orientation and every bit as genetically determined as race. Don’t believe me? Ask any straight person if they chose to be straight instead of Gay.

    Your belief that Gay is a “lifestyle” betrays your anti-gay bigotry: you believe the vile stereotypes the media and religion spoon feed you. You should know better.

    How is it any different when blacks are hated for the welfare/thug/single parent “lifestyle”? How is it any different when Jews are disdained for the ethnic/cheap/exclusionary “lifestyle”? What people see as a “lifestyle” is nothing more than a subjective perception based on ignorance and has little if anything to do with race (or fact) doesn’t it?

    If you can distinguish between race and “lifestyle” then you can make the same distinction between sexual orientation and “lifestyle”.

    Well…

  • Paul said:

    Being gay is a lifestyle. Asking for a ‘consensus’ from others does not dictate truth.

    Truth is there is no gay gene. It has been disproven time and again. The fact that there is no repeatable measurement in any study done highly suggests that there is nothing genetic about homosexuality. Given the testimony of hundreds of men and women who have been rescued from the gay lifestyle and have moved on to marry partners of the opposite sex and have families testify to this.

    [excerpt from Science 1994]
    “Time and time again, scientists have claimed that particular genes or chromosomal regions are associated with behavioral traits, only to withdraw their findings when they were not replicated.”Unfortunately,” says Yale’s [Dr. Joel] Gelernter, “it’s hard to come up with many findings linking specific genes to complex human behaviors that have been replicated.” “…
    All were announced with great fanfare; all were greeted unskeptically in the popular press; all are now in disrepute.”

  • adam said:

    oh paul. science changes. in 1994 dark energy didn’t exist. then a couple of years later it did. and now it may not again. and the consensus of hundreds of brainwashed men and women isn’t any more compelling than the consensus of millions of gay men and women who claim that they were, indeed, born that way.

  • zack said:

    Bullshit, Adam. The world is flat and Jewish people have horns. Don’t question the ways of science.

  • adam said:

    i’ve been waiting to see your jew horn for nearly two years now zack.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia theme by Michael Hutagalung -->